Overview
Criminal justice agencies depend on well-managed records to support daily operations, meet legal requirements, improve services, and maintain
accountability. In practice, criminal justice records are often fragmented across state and municipal agencies (including law enforcement), created,
stored, and reused across multiple agencies and systems without clear documentation of ownership, retention, access, or governance. The result can be
invisible decision-making, inconsistent retention, overlapping authority, ad hoc sharing, and challenges responding to public records requests.
To encourage consistency and better understand these issues, the Vermont Division of Racial Justice Statistics (DRJS) conducted a criminal justice
system gap analysis grounded in established records and information management practices. Supported by a cross-agency team, the project examines how
criminal justice records and information are created, maintained, shared, and governed across Vermont’s criminal justice landscape. The work also
surfaced connections beyond criminal justice, reinforcing the importance of breaking down agency boundaries for transformative information governance.
Using real-world examples, the team applied a unified RIM framework—combining generally accepted recordkeeping principles, traditional record
inventories, and functional analysis—to identify where records are fragmented, duplicated, or siloed. An information governance maturity model was used
to assess how governance decisions about sharing, access, and reuse are made.
This session argues that the solution is not necessarily new technology. Instead, it highlights a low-cost, practical methodology (and lessons learned)
that uses existing RIM tools to deliver meaningful improvements in data sharing, quality, storage system visibility, and long-standing governance silos.
Attendees Will
- Learn how governance decisions (ownership, standards, access controls) affect record quality, reuse, and transparency
- Gain a practical framework for assessing information gaps within their own agencies
- Identify common governance challenges that limit effective sharing and coordination
- Develop shared language to collaborate more effectively with peer agencies
- Support colleagues as records, workflows, and technology change